Plug Bug: Drive to work data

Electric Bug

My drive home includes ~1900′ of elevation gain, which takes a lot of energy. The car averaged 322 watt-hours/mile. So, what does the data look like coming too work where I drive *down* highway 17?

The controller reported 29.9 amp-hours used, which gives 229.4 watt-hours/mile. So, for my commute to work and back roundtrip, the average is: 276 watt-hours/mile. That gives a 111 mile range estimate to 100% Depth of Discharge. At a more conservative 80% discharge depth, that would be an 89 mile range when driving conservatively like I did during my test period. If I considered it as only taking 229 watt-hours/mile, it would be 134 miles to 100%, or 107 miles to 80% — but that isn’t realistic since I was driving mainly downhill on the way to work. But, a 100 mile average range might be doable if one sticks to relatively flat driving. Also note that I’m ignoring any extra draws on the battery, such as the 12v system (via the DC-DC converter) and the heater (which I wasn’t running). They easily take an additional 1-3% of the charge on my drive to work.

I mapped my drive to work, although I forgot to turn on the mapping until about a mile after I started driving. Here’s comparing the hills to the battery amps that the controller took:

Screen shot 2011-03-10 at 8.55.43 PM.png

Tags:


Subscribe
Notify of
guest

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Phil

ah yes! Just adding that one extra piece of info, the elevation, makes this chart so much more interesting!

Dennis (RE Farmer)

Despite their roundedness, VW bugs (new and old) have poor aerodynamics. The airflow becomes very turbulent (read draggy) on the back half as it tries to close in around the bug. Adding vortex generators adds energy to the air to help it stay attached (follow the bug’s shape) as the roof line slopes downward and inward. VGs have been used for years on aircraft to reduce drag and improve lift (lowers Wh/mile). This site has relatively inexpensive VGs: http://abianconi.hypermart.net/Vortex.htm
OTOH, while the added lift would lighten the bug at freeway speeds and reduce rolling resistance, increasing lift could adversely affect handling and give it squirrelly steering control. Also, the airflow coming off the flat windshield could be so turbulent that the VGs won’t do much good. Perhaps a row of VGs right at the start of the roof just behind the w/s and a second row just forward of the top of the roof would smooth the flow.

Subscribe to new posts:

You'll get an email whenever a I publish a new post to my blog and nothing more. -- Corbin

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

(c) 2008-2024 Corbin Dunn

Privacy Policy

Subscribe to RSS feeds for entries.

77 queries. 0.220 seconds.

Log in